Depictions of human genetic relationships: Exploration 2

Exploration 2: Arranging the groups on the ancestry tree so that distance reflects (to some extent) the time since branching

The order of the 18 current human groups at the base of the diagram of human ancestry from Tishkoff and collaborators is only 1 of 65536 possible orderings that preserve the same sequence of branchings from a common ancestral group 150,000 years ago.  The image that comes to mind is of a mobile with each pair of branches able to revolve around the position of its most recent common ancestor, which will itself be moving as it revolves with another branch around its common ancestor.  I found a wonderful website for building mobiles, http://www.nga.gov/kids/zone/mobile.htm, and was able to use it to replicate the Tishkoff diagram down to the level of 4 branches, i.e., AB, CC, DM, and NR.

In this mobile, I was able to make the distance between any pair of branches, i.e., (DM,NR), (CC,DR), (AB,CR) proportional to the time since they diverged.  This differs from the original Tishkoff diagram, which has, for example, A, B, and C close together at the bottom even though the common ancestor of A and B, i.e., AB, branched off 150,000 years ago from the ancestor of C, i.e., CC.  This is plenty of time for genetic divergence to occur.

The distance relationship between members of a pair does not mean that the distance between every pair of the four groups at the base of the mobile is equal to the time since their common ancestor.  Mostly, the mobile serves to remind us “that no lessons should be drawn from the order along the bottom of a branching diagram that is not already contained in the sequence of branches above” (see previous post).

The mobile software allows one to view the mobile from above as well as from the side.  In the following snapshots from above, the red ball is AB, the lime one is CC, and the blue and purple are DM and NR.  (The relative size of the balls has no significance.)

I haven’t constructed a mobile for the whole ancestry tree, but the next post extends the feature of the mobile that had the distance between any pair of branches proportional to the time since they diverged.

About these ads

About Peter J. Taylor
Peter Taylor is a Professor at the University of Massachusetts Boston where he teaches and directs undergraduate and graduate programs on critical thinking, reflective practice, and science-in-society. His research and writing focuses on the complexity of environmental and health sciences in their social context, incl. Unruly Complexity: Ecology, Interpretation, Engagement (U. Chicago Press, 2005) and Nature-nurture? No (2014, http://bit.ly/NNN2014). On reflective practice, see Taking Yourself Seriously: Processes of Research & Engagement (with J. Szteiter, 2012, http://bit.ly/TYS2012).

One Response to Depictions of human genetic relationships: Exploration 2

  1. Pingback: Depictions of human genetic relationships: Exploration 3 « Intersecting Processes

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 137 other followers